Boom Boom Boom, Going to write a blog every week this year. New Resolution, FTW!!!!
Main Contents of this Reallly Long Blog..
I) My conclusions on the Evra-Suarez racism row
II) A detailed break-down of the match, and the complaints afterwards
III) Press releases from both clubs relating to the Evra-Suarez racism row
Preface
When Manchester United met Liverpool on the 15th of October, which incidentally is my birthday, we expected fireworks. Manchester United, Liverpool, the biggest rivalry in England, Anfield, Kenneth Dalglish, Sir Alex Ferguson and all that. Well, we did see fireworks, unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons. An underwhelming 1-1 draw in a cagey match, with Wayne Rooney, Nani and Hernandez all left on the bench was followed by the extra-ordinary allegation by Patrice Evra after the match.
As of today, this racial allegation and investigation, has been the single most debated topic in football forums, arguably. A whole lot of opinions have been put forth, fans from both clubs frothing at the mouth and the neutrals having their own fun rubbing it in. This is going to the millionth blog about the incident, but I'm going to try and order things chronologically. I will also try to italicize the assumptions with proper footnotes, with the actual facts in the normal fonts.
First, I’ve given my 10 unbiased conclusions on this episode. I’ve tried to be non-biased as possible, but I do support Manchester United. So don't hold me to that.
My conclusions on the Patrice Evra – Luis Suarez race row
Conclusion 1 : Patrice Evra is not a serial offender when it comes to playing the race card. He has never played the race card, not when a complaint was made by two deaf Manchester United supporters who claimed to have lip read Steve Finnan. And certainly not in the case with the Chelsea Ground staff Sam Bethel. The offensive word heard was ‘immigrant’ and the complaint was made by Mike Phelan
Conclusion 2 : In case, you’d like to admit Evra’s testimony in the Chelsea fc incident which was deemed as ‘exaggerated and unreliable’ by the FA, as an exhibit to build a character reference on Evra, surely you need to consider Luis Suarez’ chequered past (biting, serial diving, hand ball at the World Cup etc) and perform a character reference on him as well. As both of these balance themselves out, I’m going to ignore both these cases.
Conclusion 3 : Luis Suarez is not a racist. He’s not charged with racism, but with a lesser charge of using insulting language to Evra including making reference to Evra’s skin color (Black). It’s pertinent to point out FA’s charge that Luis Suarez tried to gain unfair advantage by trying to provoke Evra and get him sent off/put him off his game. There are clearly differences in how a person is judged as a racist in today’s world. I work in a multi-cultural work environment and I’ve seen men with exemplary record and fair upbringing make offensive responses without realizing the extent of seriousness. While what Suarez had adjudged to have done him can make him a racist in some extremely harsh scale of measurement, considering Suarez’ track record in promoting anti-racism, his mixed heritage and the amount of time he had spent on FIFA programs, surely he should be given the benefit of doubt. At worse, Suarez tried to be a naughty boy and tried to put Evra off his game, and at best, he was severely misunderstood.
Conclusion 4 : What happened in England, stays in England. Ignorance can be used as a defense only till a certain point. In spite of repeated claims that racism doesn’t exist in Uruguay, Suarez and Liverpool FC ill one day have to wake up and realize that the Premier League is a competition in England, and played under the English rules, competed by the teams from England. Especially, when Luis Suarez had played professional football in Holland and served as the captain of Ajax. In the extreme case of Luis Suarez remaining unaware of the implications of using ‘Negro’, wouldn’t the smart thing to do would be an unreserved apology to Evra on any offense caused unintentionally? At least, to me, it appears so
Conclusion 5 : This isn’t about Manchester United vs Liverpool. Unfortunately, it’s been made out to be. Among all the players in this drama, 2 parties come out with head held high. Sir Alex, showed restraint in his press conferences in trying to downplay the controversy. And second, Manchester United fc, by simply refusing to give interviews when asked for more information. Compare this with the flaming wars started by Liverpool fc and Kenny Dalglish (Refer to the official interviews section)
Conclusion 7 : There is no video evidence. However much you make a noise, there’s no conclusive evidence to rule in favour of Evra or Suarez. The commission report relies on testimonies, eye witnesses; testimonials and written evidences provided by various parties and tries to rule in favour of the most likely outcome. While this could be argued as ‘subjective’, in civil matters, there’s no need for ‘proof beyond any doubt’. Although the seriousness of the allegation calls for a more rigid proof, the commission is well within its rights to rule based on the evidence given to them. This could be a potential call to re-write the rules, but as of today, we live and die by the rules of the day.
Conclusion 8 : Nobody smells like roses in this episode. Not Evra, Not Suarez, Not Kenny Dalglish, Not Damien Comolli. Bad PR could really hurt. I can’t help but feel that Liverpool fc handled the case badly. Even Suarez could be forgiven for thinking so. In spite of the club’s top brass including Mr. Damien Comolli knowing about the allegations, literally right after the complaint was made to the referee, Liverpool fc have bungled this case to no end. Constant posturing to the press and calls for Evra to be banned, and in one case, testing theories about misinformation by Kristian Walsh, this club comes out looking like a crack pot. Evra doesn’t appear like an angel either. Ill-advised interview with Canal+, and with a bit more conviction, could have nipped the issue in the bud.
Conclusion 8 : Liverpool fc’s legal team did a major cock up. The ruling was directly related to the inconsistencies in the testimonies of Suarez, Comolli and Dirk Kuyt, which changed at least 3 times in light of new evidence being shown and seem to grow with the flow of the video. Instead of the indignation at FA, Patrice Evra and Sir Alex, serious flak had to be thrown at LFC legal team.
Conclusion 9 : Considering all evidences, I’d think I’ll agree with the commission’s verdict. It’s very important to note that in spite of the cultural differences, the independent panel ruled that Suarez’ utterings of negro, even if it’s just one instance, would not be considered friendly and it will be considered as racially abusive. No amount of negrito, sudaca, my sister’s pussy, usage of negro by Martin Luther King can justify the fact that Evra is the real victim here.
Conclusion 10 : Gus Poyet is a cunt.
I’ve drawn all my conclusions based on the 2 sections explained in detail.
The Match on 15th October and the most pertinent details
To better explain on how I reached my conclusions, I think a closer look at the events during and after the match is necessary. I’ve gathered most of the information by watching the match again and reading the commission report extensively.
Potential flashpoints in the match before the actual incident
At coin toss, Evra is seen arguing with the referee Andre Marriner. As explained in the inquiry report, it seems that Evra claimed that he called the toss correctly and he should be allowed to pick sides. Marriner had used a FIFA coin with blue and yellow sides, and when the coin toss was made, it landed on the yellow side, yet he awarded the toss to Steven Gerrard, the Liverpool captain. Evra contested that he called yellow correctly, as he would never call blue, due to the Manchester City connection with the color. It seems that Evra spoke with Giggs regarding this, but it was eventually settled when Marriner assured Evra that he had got it right. Although Evra wasn't happy about this entirely, he was asked to get on with the game.
In the 12th minute of the first half, Stewart Downing ran past Evra and went to the ground on the wing, looking for a free kick (possibly a booking). To my eyes, it looked like a ridiculous dive which warranted a yellow card for Downing. However, the ref didn't award a booking, though he didn't call for a foul either. It's possible that the ref took into account the importance of the match. In the immediate aftermath of the incident, Evra could be seen gesturing to the ref waving an imaginary card. This, by itself is a yellow card offence; however Marriner gives Evra a talking to, and let it slide. It's possible that Marriner applied the same logic of a big match to Evra like he did for Downing.
In the very next minute, Evra looks like he was reacting to something that was said from the stands with a shrug of a shoulder. It did not seem like a flashpoint while watching the match, but all the same, Marriner again talks to Evra and asks him to keep a clean head, according to the regulatory commission's report.
In the second half, in and around the 46th minute, Evra is clearly unhappy with the ref's decision to award a free kick to Kuyt against Evra. Again, this doesn't appear to be a flashpoint in the match, and looks like any other incident contesting a foul awarded. This was also confirmed by Marriner to the regulatory commission.
Though all these incidents have no relation with the race allegations, these needs to be noted, as Liverpool legal team had highlighted these flashpoints to build an argument questioning Evra's temperament coming into this match.
Critical flashpoint leading up to the racism claim
In the 58th minute, Suarez and Evra end up contesting for a ball near the goal line and Suarez fouls Evra, with Evra ending up with a kick in the knee. Marriner adjudged Suarez to have fouled Evra, and looking at the replays, it's fair to say that Evra looks to make most of the foul by rolling around the floor repeatedly and the Liverpool supporters at the Kop screaming at Evra to get up. In the commission's report, Evra mentions that he was kicked in the right knee in which he had a serious injury recently and he was in real pain. I would welcome neutral's opinion on this for a more balanced opinion.
In the aftermath of the tackle, Kuyt goes over to Evra as he's rolling on the floor and says something, and Evra doesn't respond. In the commission report, according to Evra, Kuyt said "Stand up, you fucking prick". However Kuyt denies this and in his own words, he says ""This is untrue. What I did say was something to the effect of "Stand up, stand up", as if to say that it had been a foul but he was making too much of it". After receiving treatment, Evra was asked to leave the field and re-enter for receiving treatment and as he leaves the pitch, he makes a kissing gesture to the stands and kisses his badge. This incident is not mentioned in any report.
The confrontation
Suarez wins a corner after winning the ball from Fletcher in the 62nd minute. This time, I'll do a bullet pointed list of events that occurred.
62:33 : Suarez dispossesses Fletcher and dribbles past Ferdinand and Smalling and shoots at goal. The ball is deflected by Smalling and goes for a corner. The ball goes out of play at 62:37. Suarez is seen walking towards the goal line, and the camera cuts to replays at 62:43 in the regular Sky feed.
62:52 : When the cuts to live action, it's 62:52, and Suarez and Evra could be seen arguing with each other animatedly.
63:06 : Gerrard takes the corner towards Suarez, with Evra following him closely to contest the ball. Ref stops play and asks both the players to have a word with him. Kuyt runs on to the scene and tries to have a word with him, and Johnny Evans tries to drag him away. Marriner talks to both Suarez and Evra.
63:32 : As they make their way back to their position, Suarez tries to pat Evra on the back of the head, or at least places his hand at the back of Evra's head as if trying to calm down the situation. Evra knocks off Suarez' hand, and is clearly flustered. Suarez motions to the ref as if Evra isn't receptive for the argument to end. Suarez and Evra continue their argument and it doesn't appear to be friendly.
63:42 : Suarez and Evra continue to tussle for the corner, and the ball is played in. Finally Charlie Adam tries to cross the ball and it goes out of play at 63:55
64:14 : As the players make their way across the pitch, Marriner books Evra and tells him to 'calm down', and the play continues.
After this, the match continues without any incidents, in spite of Evra marking Suarez for corners.
According to the commission report however, between 62:43 and 63:06, the following happened, and it's been agreed on by everyone, including Suarez, Evra and Kuyt. While Evra and Suarez were arguing on the goal line, Kuyt steps in and faces up to Evra and prods him in the chest with his finger and Evra retaliates by pushing Kuyt away with both his hands. At this point, Suarez makes a run towards the ball and flicked it with his head, but the ref had already stopped play, possibly due to Kuyt-Evra-Suarez melee. While this posturing between Evra and Kuyt was happening, it seems that Suarez pointed/touched or pinched Evra's forearm. Video evidence is available to confirm the pinching/pointing of Evra's arm.
The dialogue between Evra and Suarez
The conversation between Evra and Suarez during this corner between 62:43 and 63:55 is where supposedly Suarez racially abused Evra. Evra alleges certain things were said to him, while Suarez alleges he said certain things and rejects few claims from Evra. Both agree to some points. I'm going to order them by this decision tree
Points of agreement between Suarez and Evra
1) The initial conversation in the goal line between Evra and Suarez was in Spanish.
2) The opening salvo was fired by Evra with the phrase 'Concha de tu hermana', which translates roughly to 'fucking hell', but the literal translation is "your sister's pussy". According to the commission report, Suarez doesn't hear this term.
3) Suarez responds by saying 'What did you say?' as he was unsure of what was said to him
4) Evra responds by saying 'Porque me diste un golpe', meaning 'Why did you kick me?' as he points to his knee in disbelief
These are considered to be true and there is no need of video evidence, as both Suarez and Evra agreed to this chain of events more or less. One thing to notice here is that Suarez didn't hear the 'Concha de tu hermana'. Reading RAWK or TLW, you'd think that Suarez had endured dog's abuse but yet did the manly thing and didn't mention it to the commission report. Well, the correct argument seems to be that Suarez didn't hear this term at all. Unfortunately, only these points have been agreed to, by both, Suarez and Evra
Evra's version
This is a blow by blow account of Evra's testimony
1) In reply to Evra's question of Why did you kick me, Suarez replied 'Porque tu eres Negro'. Evra understood this as 'Because you are a nigger' at the time of the match.
2) Evra follows that reply with 'Habla otra vez asi, te voy a dar una porrada', which means 'Say it to me again, I'm going to punch you'
3) According to Evra, Suarez replied 'No hablo con los negros', which he understood as 'I don't speak to niggers'.
4) Evra again says to Suarez 'Ahora te voy a dar realmente una porrada', which means 'Okay, now I think I'm going to punch you' in reply.
5) Again Suarez replies 'Dale, negro...negro...negro' which Evra understood as 'Okay, nigger, nigger, nigger'
6) During the conversatoin, Evra says that Suarez pointed to his skin color by pointing/touching his forearm. He was unaware of a pinch by Suarez, but he understood that Suarez was pointing/making a comment about his skin color.
The pinching is supported by video evidence, while the other points are not accompanied by clear video evidence, as both their faces are obscured. During and immediately after the match, it's clear that Evra understands the word Negro as Nigger, and not as 'Black'. However, during the commission report, he agrees that the word Negro means black.
Suarez side of the story
1) In reply to Evra's question of Why did you kick me, Suarez in his testimony says he replied 'que habia sido una falta normal', which translates to 'it was just a normal foul'. He also says that he shrugged his shoulders.
2) In reply to Evra's follow up of 'Okay, now I think I'm going to punch you' line, Suarez says he replied 'Le dije que se callara e hice un gesto breve con mi mano izquierda parecido a la mocion de un "pato cuando hace cuac" para indicarle que hablaba mucho y deberia callarse", which translates to 'I told him to shut up and made a brief gesture with my left hand like a "quacking" motion as if to say he was talking too much and should be quiet'
3) Apparently, there was no more conversation made after this, but Suarez does justify the pinching incident by offering this explanation
'Evra did not back off and Dirk Kuyt was approaching us to stand between us. At this point I touched PE's left arm in a pinching type movement. This all happened very quickly. I was trying to defuse the situation and was trying to intimate to Evra that he was not untouchable by reference to his question about the foul. Under no circumstances was this action intended to be offensive and most certainly not racially offensive. It was not in any way a reference to the color of PE's skin'
Other players’ testimony
1) De Gea : De Gea testified that he could not hear anything as he was concentrating on the corner (Rightfully so, my son)
2) Kuyt : Kuyt testified that he realised there was an exchange going on between Evra and Suarez and he stepped in to prevent Evra provoking Suarez
Evra alleges that the word Negro/Negros was used 5 times at least so far to him by Suarez, which Suarez denies.
Involvement of Referee and the aftermath
1) As the corner is taken, Marriner is informed by his assistant about the coming together of Suarez and Evra. He stops play and asks them to come forward.
As Suarez and Evra walk towards the referee, Suarez says something to Evra and walks away. Evra clearly reacts to this comment and appears agitated, and Evra appears to say something to the referee while pointing his finger at Suarez
2) According to Evra, he said to the referee 'Ref, ref, he just called me a fucking black', but he's unaware that his comments have been heard by the referee.
3) Marriner apparently says to Evra 'Calm down, Patrice, the game has been brilliant, stop the pushing between you and Suarez, the game is going well'. However, Marriner agrees to the commission that Evra said something to him and he wasn't able to hear it correctly, as he wanted to take control of the situation and gave the two players a quiet talking to.
4) According to Suarez, when the ref blew the whistle, Evra said 'Don't touch me South American' in reference to the pinch, for which he replied 'Por que, negro', which translates to 'Why, black?' in a non-racist way, as a friendly form of address. According to Suarez, it was an attempt at reconciliation. This is the only time he called Evra 'negro' in the entire match.
One point to note in this section, the word Sudaca wasn't used by Evra. Suarez alleges sudamericano was used, but Evra strongly disagrees to the use of this word at all.
Suarez patting Evra's head
1) After the ref talks to both the players, Suarez tries to pat Evra's head, again according to him which is an attempt at reconciliation.
2) Evra however reacts strongly to this and tells the referee that he doesn't want Suarez to touch him. The referee asks Suarez not to touch Evra and that seems to the end of the entire controversy as far as Suarez is concerned
Kuyt and Evra, and Evra getting booked
In the 64th minute, Marriner books Evra as he witnesses Evra pushing Kuyt away after the corner. After which, Giggs has a word with both Evra and the referee.
Evra's version of events
1) Kuyt approaches Evra and told him to stop diving, so Evra pushed Kuyt away for which he was booked.
2) After Evra was booked, Evra told the ref 'again' that he had been called black.
3) Evra acknowledged that the ref had talked to Giggs regarding the booking, and Giggs questioned Evra on what went wrong
4) Evra answered Giggs that he had been called black, for which Giggs asked him to calm down and not to get sent off
Kuyt's version of events
1) Kuyt said he approached Evra and told him 'Come on, let's move on, let's keep going with the game' and touched Evra's arm
2) Kuyt alleged that Evra smashed his arm, and the ref saw this and booked Evra
3) Kuyt also said he remained close to Evra and the ref during the booking and he alleged that he was absolutely certian that Evra said the referee was booking him only because he was black'
Marriner's version of events
1) He recalls booking Evra and he recalls him saying 'he was called black'
2) He also recalls that Evra was upset and recalls speaking to Giggs and asks him to 'Calm Patrice down'
Giggs version of events
In Giggs testimony to the commission, he recollects the following
1) Giggs approached the referee and asked him why he had booked Evra
2) Giggs recalls Marriner saying 'Calm Patrice down'
3) Giggs remembers Evra not being alright, and asked him 'What's happened'?
4) Giggs also recalls Evra telling him that he has been called black'
5) Giggs assumed that Kuyt had called Evra black, as he remembered the tussle was with Kuyt, and Giggs asked to Evra 'Did the ref hear it', to which Evra replied 'I don't think so'
6) Giggs remembers telling Evra to calm down and not to get sent off
This must be clear to everyone, Evra's version is backed up by both Giggs' and Marriner's version. It also debunks the myth that Evra did not report the racism incident on the ground, but only complained after the match. Evra did complain and bring it to the ref's attention.
As said before, the match proceed to conclusion without any further incidents
After the match
After the match as over, Evra proceeded to the dressing room and he was clearly angry and upset. Four Manchester United teammates (Valencia, Nani, Hernandez and Anderson) all of them who speak a mixture of Spanish and Portuguese within themselves, gave witness to what happened in the Manchester United dressing room.
All four of them agreed that Evra was angry and upset after the match, which was unusual, and all four of them agreed that Evra said Suarez had racially abused Evra and said he wouldn't talk to Evra because he was black. Nani remembers that Evra used the term Nigger while using English, but in Spanish/Portuguese, he used the term Negro or Preto.
Evra's version of conversation with team mates
1) Evra said he told his teammates that Suarez had called him a nigger and said he kicked him because of that. Suarez said 'Porque tu eres negro'.
2) In his own testimony, Evra did not say 'Suarez would not speak to him because he was black'.
But the commission did accept that Evra said those words to his teammates as all four of them said the same sentence.
Valencia and Anderson urged Evra to speak to Sir Alex Ferguson regarding this and go and see the referee. They accompanied Sir Alex and Evra to the referee's room, but they weren't allowed to venture inside as they wanted to show Evra their support.
Sir Alex, Referee and the official complaint
Sir Alex provided witness statement to the committee which indicated the following. Sir Alex heard Evra complain about Suarez while he was talking to David De Gea. Evra said to Sir Alex, ‘Boss, Suarez called me a nigger’. Sir Alex then asked Evra if he’d like to report this matter to the referee, and when Evra answered in the affirmative, took Evra to the referee’s room.
Sir Alex then informed Marriner that ‘Evra has been called a nigger by one of the Liverpool players and he wishes to make a formal complaint. The fourth official Phil Dowd, was asked to take notes and as Evra told the referee about the details on what happened in the pitch, they both left the room. Marriner also informed Sir Alex that he’ll need to talk to the Liverpool officials regarding this complaint.
Additional points to note in this section are
1) Marriner said that Evra complained in English, and he complained that Suarez said ‘I don’t talk to you because you niggers’, and this was included in the match report.
2) According to Evra, while making this complaint, Marriner apparently said ‘Oh, this is why you were talking about being called black’ during the game, apparently referring to the previous complaint made by Evra on field while he was booked.
3) Mr. Ray Haughan, the Team Administrator for Liverpool fc, notes that he overheard Sir Alex saying ‘I want to make a complaint because Suarez has called him a nigger five times’, as the door to the referee’s room was not closed till then. He immediately informs Kenny Dalglish, Damien Comolli and Steve Clarke through Mr. Kevin Keen as he thinks this could be a serious issue.
These events are corroborated by testimonies from Sir Alex, Evra, Mr. Ray Haughan, Andre Marriner and Kenny Dalglish. There is no reason to suspect that these are untrue.
Comolli, Dalglish and Suarez
Mr. Damien Comolli was informed by Ray Haughan of this incident before the 4th official could inform the Liverpool fc team.
Comolli - Comolli gave a witness statement and agrees to the following
1) Comolli immediately recognizes that this could be a potentially serious issue
2) Comolli spoke to Suarez in Spanish and secured his version of events so that he can report to the fourth official and the referee, as he wanted to make sure this is handled correctly, as Suarez is not comfortable with the English language.
3) Suarez said to Comolli that Evra told him ‘Don’t touch me, South American’, to which he replied ‘Por que, tu eres negro’? which means ‘Why, because you are black’? and he was also adamant that no racial abuse was intended.
Dalglish
1) Dalglish confirms that he thought it would be better if Comolli spoke to the referee as he has a better grasp of English as a language.
2) Dalglish confirmed the following
a. Comolli said to Dalglish, that Suarez had replied to Evra ‘Tu eres negro’ when he was told ‘Don’t touch me, South American’
b. Dalglish understood that ‘Tu eres negro’, meant ‘you are black’.
c. Suarez was in the same room when the conversation happened between Dalglish and Comolli.
Suarez
1) Suarez’s account of this conversation is as follows
a. Comolli explained to Suarez that Sir Alex and Evra had complained to the referee that Suarez had racially insulted Evra five times (or at least 5 times) during the game
b. Comolli asked Suarez to explain himself
c. Suarez replied that Evra said to him ‘Don’t touch me, South American’, and he had said ‘Por que negro?’ and that is the only thing he had said.
As you can see, this version differs from both Dalglish’ and Comolli’s statement as it leaves out the critical ‘tu eres’ part. Thus, ‘Why, because you are black?’ becomes ‘Why, black?’ Instead of a question which could be construed as racist in nature depending on the context, it becomes an attempt at reconciliation (at least in Uruguay)
Dalglish and Comolli speak to the referee
Phil Dowd, at the behest of Andre Marriner, asked for Dalglish and Suarez to come and speak to the referee regarding this complaint. After making a joke about the 30 minute rule, Kenny Dalglish makes his way to the referee’s room, and he conveyed that Suarez will not be joining him, as he’s not comfortable with English language.
Dalglish acknowledges the following in his report
1) Marriner informs about the complaint by Sir Alex and Patrice Evra
2) Dalglish’ first response was ‘Hasn’t he done this before?’ which prompted Phil Dowd to think and recollect any previous allegation by Evra
3) Dalglish responded that Suarez responded ‘you are black’, in response to the taunt by Evra as ‘you are South American’, to him and Comolli
4) Marriner informs that a formal complaint has been made and he will include both the incidents in the status reports.
Mr. Marriner also said in his testimony that Evra’s complaint was that Suarez said to Evra ‘I don’t talk to you because you niggers’, although Kenny Dalglish doesn’t recollect this particular sentence.
After Dalglish had left the referee’s room, Comolli entered and introduced himself and he wanted to confirm the events told by Dalglish to Mr. Marriner. Comolli also said he speaks fluent Spanish according Marriner and he confirmed that Suarez said ‘Tues negro’, which translates to ‘you are black’. Comolli was asked to spell ‘Tues negro’, as neither Marriner and Dowd knew Spanish and Comolli did so. Comolli again confirmed that there has been a translation problem and at no point, Suarez said the word ‘niggers’. Comolli was assured that this would be included in the referee’s report.
Referee report
As confirmed, Mr. Marriner wrote the referee’s report with the help of the notes taken by Phil Dowd. The notes taken by Down was a rough bullet point based on what was said, although this report was not exactly as was said by the participants. Once Mr. Marriner had penned the referee’s report, he disposed of Dowd’s notes.
This is the actual report that was written Mr. Marriner.
"I have to bring to your attention an unsavoury event which happened today and was reported to me in my dressing room after the above game.
Sir Alex Ferguson and Patrice Evra entered my dressing room to register an official complaint about a comment made to Patrice Evra by Liverpool player Luis Suarez.
During a coming together in the penalty area in the second half of play, Luis Suarez is alleged to have said to Patrice Evra "I don't talk to you because you niggers".
I said to Sir Alex and Patrice that I would include the incident in my report but needed to speak to Liverpool manager Kenny Dalglish to seek Luis Suarez' version of events.
Kenny Dalglish entered my dressing room at my request and having been told about the incident responded with a different version of events. He said Suarez had responded with "you are black" having first been taunted with "you are South American" by Evra.
Liverpool Director of football Damien Comolli then entered the dressing room to confirm Suarez' version of events as he speaks fluent Spanish.
Evra first said "you are South American" to Suarez who responded with "Tues Negro" which translates "you are Black". Damien Comolli went on to say he thinks it got lost in translation and at no time did Suarez say the word "Niggers".
I confirmed that this incident would be reported."
Evra interview and Suarez facebook page
After the match was over, Evra gave an interview to the French TV Canal+, when he publicly accused Suarez of making racial slurs against him during the course of the match. The full extract of the Canal+ interview translated in English is given below.
"After the Manchester United match in Liverpool yesterday, Patrice Evra spoke again on Luis Suarez' attitude. The Uruguayan striker allegedly made racial slurs against him throughout the match. Commentary by Stephane Guy at the microphone.
Stephane Guy :
"Is this the first time that this has happened to you on a professional field?
Evra :
First time that it has happened to me, first time that a player has said racist things to me like that. I am really, I am really concerned because he has no need for that, he is a good player and then this. He tried to make me lose it. It shows that it was really to make me lose it, but at the start, well, we will see. It still hurts. If it's by the fans, I won't say it's fine, because it's still a shame, but when it's a player who is playing the same game as you, it's even harder to accept. Especially when I think that he has played with teammates who were my colour. So, at the start, well I won't go into a big debate about it, we are going to see the arbitrator, there will be an investigation, there is the video. You can even see clearly on his lips what he told me at least ten times. So I'm calm from that point of view."
Patrice Evra's allegations have indeed been taken very seriously by the English Association and an investigation has certainly been launched."
Evra’s version of events
Evra confirmed that as the only French player in the United squad, he’s normally approached for Interviews by the Canal+ after matches, and he generally agrees. As he was familiar with the crew of Canal+, they could guess that he was upset by something. Off the record, he said what happened during the game to Stephane Guy, and Evra instructed the interviewer, not to ask anything about it during the interview. However, Stephane Guy proceeded to ask the question and on air, Evra decided to answer the question, without divulging vital details like what word was said.
Points to note in this section
1) Evra agreed that he said he was abused racially 10 times. Although this count is not correct, Evra clarified that it’s a figure of speech in French, when you say, I got done 10 times, instead of saying I got done many a time.
2) Comolli alleged that Evra approached the Canal+ and offered this story voluntarily. He also agreed that there’s a figure of speech in French about saying 10 times, but he was unsure that for something serious as a racial allegation, a figure of speech could be used.
3) Evra also produced a supplemental statement from Stephane Guy, who clarified that Evra had explicitly asked him not to ask about the racial slurs, but as a journalist, he used his journalistic privilege to question him regardless, thereby causing the commission report to reject Comolli’s claim.
Press releases by football clubs after the match
Immediately after this incident, there were few press releases from each club. I will try to organize this by timeline again.
15th October : Sir Alex alleges Suarez dives around the place
Speaking about the free-kick awarded, Ferguson told the BBC: "I think it was a very soft one, but the referee is under tremendous pressure. It's a very soft award.
"The boy Suarez dives around all over the place, so it's very difficult for the referee to judge whether it’s a foul or it isn't a foul."
16th October : Liverpool want Patrice Evra banned if the allegations are not proven
Liverpool have given their firm backing to Luis Suárez over his denial that he racially abused Patrice Evra at Anfield on Saturday – and want the Manchester United defender to receive a ban from the Football Association should his accusations prove groundless.
The Uruguay international has vehemently denied Evra's allegations that he racially abused him during Liverpool's 1-1 draw with United and will fight to clear his name if the FA decides to open a disciplinary case.
Suárez has also received a show of support from his employers. A Liverpool spokesman said: "Luis is adamant that he has not used language of that nature and the club is totally supportive of the player."
The inquiry will begin with the FA asking to speak to Evra on Monday to ascertain whether he intends to make an official complaint. Evra's accusation is that he was called "a nigger" – the Senegal-born Frenchman said he heard it "at least 10 times" – but Suárez insists it is not true.
17th October : Gordon Taylor of PFA volunteers to play the peacemaker
Speaking at the Professional Players Federation (PPF) annual conference on Monday, Taylor said he would be prepared to mediate if necessary. "It's something we've done in the past and it's something I hope we'll be asked to do in the future," Taylor said. "We need to try to cool down and reflect on what happened and to contact the FA and see what form their inquiry will take.
"It's good to get this put behind us as quickly as possible, instead of letting these things fester and become blown up again. It's very disappointing to have two of our players from different countries at odds over a very serious issue. Only by having a full inquiry on such matters can we get to the bottom of it and try to make sure that such problems don't arise again in the future.
17th October : Evra wants to pursue racism claims, claims Sir Alex
"I spoke to Patrice today. He is adamant he wants to follow it on," said Ferguson.
The controversy came at the end of a game which Ferguson was pleased to report had otherwise passed off without incident.
Prior to Saturday lunchtime's clash, the United boss had urged his club's supporters not to stand during the game, and then pleaded with fans of both sides not to abuse their opponents over the Munich and Hillsborough tragedies respectively.
"It is not an easy one for us," said Ferguson.
"Everyone knows Manchester United and Liverpool have great responsibilities in terms of things that happen on the field.
"Saturday was terrific. Both sets of fans were good. There was not any of that silly chanting we have had in previous years. Both sets of fans deserve praise for that.
"It is not something we would want to level against Liverpool and it is not against Liverpool.
"Obviously Patrice feels very aggrieved at what was said to him.
"It rests in the hands of the FA now."
20th October : Dalglish stands by Suarez
"The only thing I will say - and then it is put to bed - is that the football club and everyone at the football club is totally and utterly fully behind Luis Suarez," said Dalglish.
"There was an allegation after the game about him diving all over the place and there was an allegation from Patrice Evra.
"Obviously the two things are emotive but we support the wee man on both things.
"At the start of the week the club made their position known and apart from what I have said we won't be adding to it.
"We are fully looking forward to a complete, transparent report from the FA and we will co-operate 100 per cent."
22nd October : Sir Alex claims FA asked clubs not to give interviews
"The FA interviewed Patrice yesterday and have sent us a directive today saying not to discuss it while the investigation is going on," revealed Ferguson on Friday.
"I have got plenty to say on the subject, but I suppose I will have to adhere to what they are saying.
"I would like to say something about Pat in this particular instance, but let them get on with their investigation."
The FA has refused to confirm the latest situation, or how long the investigations will take.
22nd October : Dalglish defends Suarez again, in spite of FA ban on interviews on the subject
"I think the problem is there are people who question Luis Suarez's integrity," said Liverpool's manager.
"It is their integrity that needs questioning, not his.
"On the football pitch he is exemplary, a fantastic footballer and we have 100 per cent faith in Luis Suarez and the way he conducts himself."
27th October : Dalglish says Suarez isn’t a diver (following up on a similar interview by Enrique)
The Liverpool boss told his club's official website of Suarez, who was substituted before the final whistle while carrying a slight limp: "He got kicked right at the end of the first half. He turned Jonathan Woodgate.
"He made contact with him, but he tried to stay on his feet to take the chance. That's where he hurt his leg.
"That just emphasises what we say about the wee man. He had the opportunity to stay on his feet (and did)."
29th October : Dalglish wants a swift resolution to the Suarez case
He said: "I don't think it is prevalent in the game here, and it certainly isn't at this football club.
"For me, I don't see racism as far as this football club is concerned, apparent in any way, shape or form.
"We have got a case going on ourselves which seems to be dragging its feet.
"We would rather have it done and dusted, out in the open and whoever is the guilty party, whether it's the person who said it or the accuser, get their due punishment.
"We look forward to the case coming to a conclusion."
03rd November : Dalglish wants Suarez conclusion
"The FA have been here and spoken to us," said Dalglish.
"Our philosophy and desire has not changed whatsoever - we want it resolved as quickly as it possibly can be and want the perpetrator punished. I don't think we need to add any more than that."
A spokesman for the FA said the matter was ongoing and they did not expect a conclusion this week.
08th November : No case to answer, says Suarez
"The FA will have to clarify things with [Evra]," Suarez is quoted by El Pais.
"There is no evidence I said anything racist to him. I said nothing of the sort. There were two parts of the discussion, one in Spanish, one in English.
"I did not insult him. It was just a way of expressing myself. I called him something his team-mates at Manchester call him, and even they were surprised by his reaction.
"These things happen in football, in the heat of the moment.
"They leave someone looking bad. Now we have to see how the matter is decided and then, for him as much as me, we will have things clear. And wherever the fault lies, we are going to have to say sorry."
17th November : Suarez charged by FA, Liverpool offer support
The governing body said in a statement on Wednesday: "The FA has today charged Liverpool's Luis Suarez following an incident that occurred during the Liverpool versus Manchester United fixture at Anfield on 15 October 2011.
"It is alleged that Suarez used abusive and/or insulting words and/or behaviour towards Manchester United's Patrice Evra contrary to FA rules.
"It is further alleged that this included a reference to the ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race of Patrice Evra.
"The FA will issue no further comment at this time."
Liverpool have received notification of the FA's decision to charge Suarez and they will hold talks with the Uruguayan when he returns to Anfield from international duty.
"The club this afternoon received notification from the Football Association of their decision to charge Luis Suarez and will take time to properly review the documentation which has been sent to us," read a Liverpool statement.
"We will discuss the matter fully with him when he returns from international duty, but he will plead not guilty to the charge and we expect him to request a personal hearing.
"Luis remains determined to clear his name of the allegation made against him by Patrice Evra. The club remain fully supportive of Luis in this matter."
18th November : Gus Poyet offers support for Suarez
The Brighton man says he was often abused during his seven years in Spain prior to joining Chelsea and thinks Evra is 'crying like a baby' by complaining.
"I played for seven years in Spain and was called everything because I was from South America," said the former Tottenham man.
"And I never went out crying like a baby, like Patrice Evra, saying that someone said something to me.
"I believe Suarez. It's simple. I am surprised in a really sad way that he has been charged.
"I think it is worse to charge someone because you trust one person when you have no proof."
He added: "I am sad because it is going to become too easy. I can make a complaint about an opposition manager and if I take it as far as I can he will be charged.
"Why are we going to take one person's word over another's?"
18th November : Kenny offers backing to Suarez, again
The Scot said: "I think the statement says everything we have to say. We have to move on now, take it as it comes and see what happens.
"I don't think his form will suffer for any reason other than - like everyone else - sometimes you don't play as well as you can.
"It helps some, hinders others. We have to get on with whatever hand we are dealt and not feel sorry for ourselves. If adversity stirs someone up then fine.
"The standard he has set himself is very high and very difficult to achieve week in, week out. But even when he is not playing well, he is a lot better than most people."
18th November : Fergie criticizes Poyet and Liverpool fc
United boss Ferguson has hit back at Poyet’s remarks, insisting they are ill-timed in a week which has seen FIFA president Sepp Blatter spark controversy by downplaying the impact of racism in the game.
"We have been asked by the FA not to say anything about the investigation and we've abided by that," Ferguson said in a press conference on Sky Sports News.
"I think Liverpool have been drip feeding a lot of stuff out in the last couple of weeks. At the end of the day the FA will deal with it. I'm more surprised by Gus Poyet's remarks.
"I think that's inappropriate at a time when people throughout the world are condemning racism. I think he's chosen the wrong time.
"I can understand why he wants to support somebody from his country but he's got to think more about it.
"I don't know how the question has been loaded but it seems his criticism of Evra is a bit silly."
20th November : Poyet stands by defence of Poyet
He told TalkSPORT: "I know Luis very well and I will go to court if someone wants to prove he's not racist. "I can assure you and everyone Luis is not a racist. We use different words and it is a different kind of situation. "We live in Uruguay with plenty of people who have different colour skin. We all live together and play football together.
"What hurts me the most is that you accuse someone. Luis Suarez has been accused of being a racist."
The Seagulls manager is adamant that Suarez's words have been misunderstood due to language differences but was unable to clarify what has been said between the two players.
He added: "You are not racist when you go against one, but (you are) if you go against the whole world of different colour and nationalities. That is being racist, not saying one word in one moment.
"If that's what you want, fair enough. I take it and accept it. I had to behave in a different way because I've been in England for 13 years. So I know what you are like and I adapt to that.
"Give Suarez another six months and I think he'll be how you want him to be."
29th November : Poyet re-affirms his solidarity with Suarez
Poyet will not be altering his stance, though, and maintains that Suarez is not the type of person to discriminate against others.
He said: "If you are racist, you are against someone who is not like you. Because you are from another country, another continent, or because of the colour of your skin, for me it's the same. And in football they do it to make us react, to go crazy, so we deal with that.
"Patrice Evra should deal with that. Suarez is a lovely guy, and 100 per cent not a racist. I have texted him to support him and to say I'm available if he needs me."
06th December : Dalglish demands more protection for Suarez
"I would like to see you write that in the paper because you would be in a bit of trouble as well. You write what you want to write.
"At the end of the day, we will look after Luis the best we can and I think it is about time he got a wee bit of protection from some people.
"His integrity is impeccable. He can look in the mirror and go to bed at night and sleep soundly. If other people can do that then fine. All we ask is to be fair, is to be honest."
09th December : Rooney appeal angers Dalglish
Dalglish believes the FA should look at their own actions before tackling other issues.
"I find it a bit strange the FA are supposed to be setting an example for things yet they appeal against Wayne Rooney's three-match ban."
"I don't think that's a good example to set."
And Dalglish labelled the way the FA have dragged their heels over Suarez's racism charge as a "joke".
"The fact it has taken nine weeks to get a decision on one of the other charges is a bit of a joke as well," added Dalglish.
"I don't think that has helped as well. The circus which is around about him has been caused mainly by that.
"That will be done sooner rather than later and we will move forward."
09th December : Suarez victimized
Before Dalglish's pre-match press conference for Saturday's home match against QPR, the Liverpool boss showed video clips from Craven Cottage to highlight why is unhappy about Suarez's treatment.
"The people at Liverpool and anyone who has any leaning to the club will stand by him. They know what the truth is."
The Scot said: "There's been at least four incidents that we've picked out where nothing has happened, not even a charge.
"People just jump on the bandwagon and accuse him of this, that and everything else.
"They are entitled to tackle but tackle fairly. It is only in other people's interests that if they can't stop him on the pitch, they have to try other means and that is what they are trying to do.
"Most of the things are outside our control. What we have within our control we'll get on with it and we believe we will get the benefit of the doubt at some stage.
"The people at Liverpool and anyone who has any leaning to the club - be it staff, players, supporters - will stand by him. They know what the truth is.
"If anyone wants to see the truth from the other night it is on the screen."
16th December : Dalglish backs Suarez again
Dalglish will attend the hearing in person to defend Suarez but the Scot would not comment on the issue.
"We have said many times before we cannot say anything which will be prejudicial," he said.
"We are standing right beside him and helping him as much as we possibly can.
"After it's finished there is a chance to have a conversation.
"As I said last week the FA should have given you (the media) the information when everything was happening, not us."
If Suarez, who has always denied the allegations, is found guilty he could be banned or fined, or both.
17th December : Jol will be surprised if the charges against Suarez is proved
Jol believes the 24-year-old is a 'real leader' and admits he will be staggered if Suarez is found guilty.
He told The Sun: "If it is true, I am surprised. At Ajax we had players from all over the world.
"He was my captain and his job was to make them feel comfortable. He was a real leader.
"A real leader would never do things like that."
21st December : Suarez handed eight match ban
A statement from the FA read: "On 16 November 2011, The Football Association charged Luis Suarez with misconduct contrary to FA Rule E3 in relation to the Liverpool FC versus Manchester United FC fixture on 15 October 2011.
"A hearing took place from 14-20 December 2011 before an Independent Regulatory Commission of The FA to consider the charge.
"The Independent Regulatory Commission announced its decision on 20 December 2011, which is as follows:
1. Mr Suarez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);
2. the insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);
3. Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;
4. the [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision.
"Mr Suarez has the right to appeal the decision of the Independent Regulatory Commission to an Appeal Board. An appeal must be lodged within 14 days of the date of the written reasons for the decision.
"The penalty is suspended until after the outcome of any appeal, or the time for appealing expires, or should Mr Suarez decide not to appeal. The reason for this is to ensure that the penalty does not take effect before any appeal so that Mr Suarez has an effective right of appeal."
Suarez will continue to be available to Reds manager Kenny Dalglish, who has always backed the former Ajax striker, over the busy festive period.
21st December : Reds furious over Suarez ban
Liverpool have claimed that the FA were 'determined to bring charges' against the forward and feel it is 'extraordinary' that Suarez was found guilty on Evra's evidence alone.
"It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist."
A statement on the club's official website read: "Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.
"We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.
"We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United team-mates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.
"The club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.
"LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.
"It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.
"Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.
"He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.
"It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.
"It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.
"We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult."
21st December : Taylor says Suarez ban is a deterrent for the future
Taylor says the FA must have had 'compelling evidence' to reach such a decision and feels it is important that players know for the future that racist behaviour will be punished.
"We are a multicultural society but also our football is very cosmopolitan and it is important that we send out the strongest message if there has been racist abuse," Taylor told Sky Sports News.
"Clearly it is an Independent Regulatory Commission set up by the FA. They must have had compelling evidence to come out with such a very strong sanction as a deterrent for the future."
21st December : Liverpool teammates stand by Suarez
"Luis Suarez is our team-mate and our friend and as a group of players we are shocked and angered that he has been found guilty by the FA," read a strongly-worded statement on Liverpool's official website
"We totally support Luis and we want the world to know that. We know he is not racist.
"We are a squad of many different nationalities and backgrounds. All of us support the club's commitment to fighting racism.
"All of us accept there is no place in the game for any form of discrimination. As a group of players we totally support the Kick it Out Campaign.
"We have lived, trained and played with Luis for almost 12 months and we don't recognise the way he has been portrayed.
"We will continue to support Luis through this difficult period, and as a popular and respected friend of all his team-mates, he will not walk alone.
22nd December : Liverpool united behind by Suarez
Suarez was available to play at the DW Stadium as Liverpool have 14 days from receiving the written verdict from the FA to decide whether they will appeal.
He endured a frustrating night as the Reds were held to a goalless draw, but received the backing of his team-mates who wore T-shirts depicting an image of Suarez and his name and number seven.
Dalglish, who also wore the T-shirt as he faced the media, insisted that support was reflected throughout the club.
"I think if anybody had any doubt in their mind that the players and the football club, and everyone associated with the football club, support Luis Suarez, then they are under no illusions now," he told Sky Sports.
"I think the boys showed their respect and admiration for Luis with wearing the T-shirts.
"It is a great reflection of the man as a character, a person and a footballer that the boys have been so supportive and so have the supporters.
"He has earned that. He deserves it and we will always stand beside him.
"They will not divide the football club, no matter how hard they try."
24th December : Fergie says Suarez ban was right
Liverpool responded with a strongly-worded statement in which they criticised the FA and claimed Evra should also face charges after he admitted insulting Suarez during the altercation, while their players wore T-shirts in support of the Uruguayan before their draw with Wigan.
Ferguson initially insisted he had 'nothing to say' about the T-shirts, but has now broken his silence and stated the FA reached the correct decision.
"Our support of Patrice was obvious right from the word go and that's still the same," he said.
"The matter is over and I think we're satisfied that they [the FA's independent commission] found the right decision.
"This wasn't about Manchester United and Liverpool at all. It was nothing to do with that. This was an individual situation where one person was racially abused."
The Scot also drew parallels with Evra's four-game ban in 2008 following an incident involving Chelsea groundsman Sam Bethell, saying Liverpool should do what United did and take the punishment even if they disagree.
"Patrice got that suspension for the incident down at Chelsea when no-one was there, just a groundsman and our fitness coach," he said. "He got a four-match ban and we had to wait two weeks for the evidence to come through.
"We were quite astounded at that. A four-match ban? We thought it was well over the top for a trivial incident. But it happened and there's nothing you can do about it, you know."
Official press releases by LFC and Manchester United
16th November - LFC issue Suarez statement
The Club this afternoon received notification from the Football Association of their decision to charge Luis Suarez and will take time to properly review the documentation which has been sent to us.
We will discuss the matter fully with him when he returns from international duty, but he will plead not guilty to the charge and we expect him to request a personal hearing.
Luis remains determined to clear his name of the allegation made against him by Patrice Evra.
The Club remain fully supportive of Luis in this matter.
20th December - LFC issue Suarez statement
Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.
We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.
We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.
The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.
LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.
It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.
Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.
He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.
It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.
It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.
We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
3rd January 2012 - LFC issue Suarez statement
It is our strongly held conviction that the Football Association and the panel it selected constructed a highly subjective case against Luis Suarez based on an accusation that was ultimately unsubstantiated.
The FA and the panel chose to consistently and methodically accept and embrace arguments leading to a set of conclusions that found Mr. Suarez to "probably" be guilty while in the same manner deciding to completely dismiss the testimony that countered their overall suppositions.
Mr. Evra was deemed to be credible in spite of admitting that he himself used insulting and threatening words towards Luis and that his initial charge as to the word used was somehow a mistake.
The facts in this case were that an accusation was made, a rebuttal was given and there was video of the match. The remaining facts came from testimony of people who did not corroborate any accusation made by Mr. Evra.
In its determination to prove its conclusions to the public through a clearly subjective 115-page document, the FA panel has damaged the reputation of one of the Premier League's best players, deciding he should be punished and banned for perhaps a quarter of a season. This case has also provided a template in which a club's rival can bring about a significant ban for a top player without anything beyond an accusation.
Nevertheless, there are ultimately larger issues than whether or not Luis Suarez has been treated fairly by the Football Association in this matter. There are important points we want to make today that overshadow what has occurred during the past two months.
The issue of race in sports, as in other industries, has a very poor history. Far too often, and in far too many countries, the issues of racism and discrimination have been covered over or ignored.
In America, where Liverpool ownership resides, there was a shameful bigotry that prevented black athletes from competing at the highest levels for decades.
English football has led the world in welcoming all nationalities and creeds into its Premier League and its leagues below, and Liverpool Football Club itself has been a leader in taking a progressive stance on issues of race and inclusion. The Luis Suarez case has to end so that the Premier League, the Football Association and the Club can continue the progress that has been made and will continue to be made and not risk a perception, at least by some, that would diminish our commitment on these issues.
Liverpool Football Club have supported Luis Suarez because we fundamentally do not believe that Luis on that day - or frankly any other - did or would engage in a racist act. Notably, his actions on and off the pitch with his teammates and in the community have demonstrated his belief that all athletes can play together and that the colour of a person's skin is irrelevant.
Continuing a fight for justice in this particular case beyond today would only obscure the fact that the Club wholeheartedly supports the efforts of the Football Association, the Football League and the Premier League to put an end to any form of racism in English football.
It is time to put the Luis Suarez matter to rest and for all of us, going forward, to work together to stamp out racism in every form both inside and outside the sport.
It is for this reason that we will not appeal the eight-game suspension of Luis Suarez.
Manchester United did not release an official statement on this, except interviews given by Sir Alex Ferguson.
I conclude the first part of my case study.
The end.
